SEAFDECINSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORY
    • English
    • ไทย
    • 日本語
    • Bahasa Indonesia
  • English 
    • English
    • ไทย
    • 日本語
    • Bahasa Indonesia
  • Login
View Item 
  •   SEAFDEC Institutional Repository (SIR)
  • 03 SEAFDEC External Publications
  • Journal Articles, Conference Papers and Book Chapters by SEAFDEC Staff
  • Journal Articles
  • AQD
  • View Item
  •   SEAFDEC Institutional Repository (SIR)
  • 03 SEAFDEC External Publications
  • Journal Articles, Conference Papers and Book Chapters by SEAFDEC Staff
  • Journal Articles
  • AQD
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Analysis of biosecurity-related policies governing the seaweed industry of the Philippines

Thumbnail
View/Open
Request this document
Date
2020-03-10
Author
Mateo, Jonalyn P.
Campbell, Iona
Cottier-Cook, Elizabeth J.
Luhan, Maria Rovilla J.
Ferriols, Victor Marco Emmanuel N.
Hurtado, Anicia Q.
Page views
67
Share 
 
Metadata
Show full item record

Cited times in Scopus



Abstract
The seaweed industry in the Philippines is a significant contributor to aquaculture production, both nationally and internationally. It out-produces the capture fisheries sector and most global producers, with the exception of China and Indonesia. Seaweed species, particularly Kappaphycus and Eucheuma spp., have been farmed throughout the country since the early 1970s. In 2017, the Philippines produced 1.4 million tonnes (fwt) and exported 35,490 tonnes of seaweed and carrageenan with a value of US$174 million. However, a decreasing trend in seaweed production has been observed since the mid-2000s as a result of pest and disease outbreaks, among other factors, which have been exacerbated by climate change. This paper is the first to analyze biosecurity-related national policies and legislation (a.k.a. ‘frameworks’ collectively), which are relevant to the seaweed industry in the Philippines. A total of 12 frameworks were identified, of which a sub-set of seven were compared using defined biosecurity themes, risks, and management measures to evaluate how seaweed biosecurity is incorporated into national policy. The inclusion of biosecurity-related activities in national frameworks was found to be limited to aquatic animal commodities or agricultural crops. Only the Code of Good Aquaculture Practices (GAqP) for seaweed specifically included seaweed cultivation, however, it did not include any biosecurity measures. The results indicated a clear gap in current biosecurity legislation and policy in the Philippines, which if addressed have the potential to reduce the impact of endemic and emergent diseases and pests and support the sustainable growth of this important industry.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10862/3586
Suggested Citation
Mateo, J. P., Campbell, I., Cottier-Cook, E. J., Luhan, M. R. J., Ferriols, V. M. E. N., & Hurtado, A. Q. (2020). Analysis of biosecurity-related policies governing the seaweed industry of the Philippines. Journal of Applied Phycology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-020-02083-7
Subject
Biosecurity; Policies; Seaweed industry; Seaweeds; Kappaphycus; Eucheuma
Collections
  • AQD [1108]

© SEAFDEC 2021
Contact Us | Send Feedback
 

 

Browse

All of SIRCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics
Related Links
SEAFDEC/TD IRSEAFDEC/AQD IRSEAFDEC/MFRDMD IRSEAFDEC/IFRDMD IR

© SEAFDEC 2021
Contact Us | Send Feedback