Show simple item record

Share 
 
dc.contributor.authorTabbu, N.S.
dc.contributor.authorKungvankij, P.
dc.contributor.authorTaleon, GA.
dc.contributor.authorPotesta, I.
dc.contributor.authorBautista, M.
dc.contributor.editorTaki, Yasuhiko
dc.contributor.editorPrimavera, Jurgenne H.
dc.contributor.editorLlobrera, Jose A.
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-20T03:41:15Z
dc.date.available2012-04-20T03:41:15Z
dc.date.issued1985
dc.identifier.citationTabbu, N. S., Kungvankij, P., Taleon, G. A., Potesta, I., & Bautista, M. (1985). Evaluation of artificial feeds for shrimp (Penaeus monodon ) production in brackishwater ponds (Abstract only). In Taki Y., Primavera J.H. and Llobrera J.A. (Eds.). Proceedings of the First International Conference on the Culture of Penaeid Prawns/Shrimps, 4-7 December 1984, Iloilo City, Philippines (pp. 183-184). Iloilo City, Philippines: Aquaculture Department, Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center.en
dc.identifier.isbn9718511008
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10862/940
dc.descriptionAbstract only.en
dc.description.abstractThe experiment was conducted in fifteen 500-m2 brackishwater ponds to determine the response of Penaeus monodon juveniles fed with various artificial diets. Five treatments with three replicates each were: two commercial feeds containing 45% and 40% crude protein (treatments I and II), two experimental diets formulated to contain 35% crude protein (treatments III and IV) and control, without feeding (treatment V). Shrimp were fed twice daily at feeding rates based on shrimp consumption. Highest mean harvest weight was attained in treatment I (23.47 g) > III (19.25 g) > II (18.86 g) > IV (11.29 g) > V (9.27 g). Statistical analysis showed that differences in growth were significant at 5% probability level. However, growth in treatments I, II and III are comparable, also growth in treatments II, III and IV. Growth in treatments I, II, III and IV was significantly different from treatment V. Highest mean survival was attained in treatment III (91.82%) > I (88.93%) > II (86.95%) > IV (83.62%) V (82.62%). Statistical analysis showed no significant differences among treatments at 5% probability level. Projecting on a hectare basis, mean yield for each treatment was: I (628.37 kg) > II (496.35 kg) per crop in 120 days culture. Good yield was attributed to provision of formulated feeds, use of pumps in addition to tidal change for water exchange and control of predators, and pest eradication through proper pond preparation.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherAquaculture Department, Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Centeren
dc.subjectDietsen
dc.subjectFeed compositionen
dc.subjectJuvenilesen
dc.subjectShrimp cultureen
dc.subjectPenaeus monodonen
dc.titleEvaluation of artificial feeds for shrimp (Penaeus monodon) production in brackishwater pondsen
dc.typeConference posteren
dc.citation.spage183
dc.citation.epage184
dc.citation.conferenceTitleProceedings of the First International Conference on the Culture of Penaeid Prawns/Shrimps, 4-7 December 1984, Iloilo City, Philippinesen
dc.subject.scientificNamePenaeus monodon


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView
ficcpps_p183-184.pdf247.7Kbapplication/pdfView/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record