SEAFDECINSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORY
    • English
    • ไทย
    • 日本語
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Burmese
    • Filipino
    • Khmer
    • Lao
    • Tiếng Việt
  • 日本語 
    • English
    • ไทย
    • 日本語
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Burmese
    • Filipino
    • Khmer
    • Lao
    • Tiếng Việt
  • ログイン
アイテム表示 
  •   ホーム
  • 03 SEAFDEC External Publications
  • Journal Articles, Conference Papers and Book Chapters by SEAFDEC Staff
  • Journal Articles
  • AQD Journal Articles
  • アイテム表示
  •   ホーム
  • 03 SEAFDEC External Publications
  • Journal Articles, Conference Papers and Book Chapters by SEAFDEC Staff
  • Journal Articles
  • AQD Journal Articles
  • アイテム表示
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Fish predation on mangrove-associated penaeids: The role of structures and substrate

Thumbnail
閲覧/開く
日付
1997
著者
Primavera, J. H.
Page views
465
Metadata
アイテムの詳細レコードを表示する

Cited times in Scopus



Share 
 
抄録
The effect of habitat structure and substratum on predation of the greasyback shrimp Metapenaeus ensis (De Haan), white shrimp Penaeus merguiensis De Man and tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon Fabricius by sea bass Lates calcarifer Bloch and mangrove snapper Lutjanus argentimaculatus (Forsskal) was evaluated. The shrimp juveniles measured 6–15 mm in carapace length; fish measured 6.5–12.5 cm in standard length; structure types were pneumatophores of the mangrove Sonneratia griffithii Kurz and dried coconut leaf bracts; structure densities were 0, 32 and 98 pneumatophores per tank; and sediment particle sizes were pebbles, sand-granules and silt–sand.

Predation on shrimp was significantly higher in controls or bare sand (48.7%) than among pneumatophores (29.9%), but not among leaf bracts (43.5%). Shrimp mortality was also significantly higher on bare sand (72.9%) compared to medium-density (54.2%), but not high-density (68.8%), pneumatophores. Fish predation on the burying shrimp M. ensis was affected by predator type but not by sediment size. The generally higher predation rates of snapper may be due to their habit of leaving unconsumed pieces of shrimp, whereas sea bass which devour whole prey require fewer shrimp to reach satiation. Moreover, the presence of structures did not affect sea bass behaviour of chasing prey among pneumatophores and under leaf bracts, but reduced predation by the relatively passive snapper. Predation rates among pneumatophores vs. control, and among medium-density pneumatophores vs. bare sand, were lower for P. monodon but not P. merguiensis. This may be related to the greater and more frequent use of (laboratory) shelters by juvenile tiger shrimp compared to white shrimp. The results demonstrate that the effective provision of shelter depends not only on structure type and density but on the behaviour of predator and prey as well. The use of mangrove structures (pneumatophores) by juvenile shrimp as refuge from predation is also documented for the first time.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10862/1596
Suggested Citation
Primavera, J. H. (1997). Fish predation on mangrove-associated penaeids: The role of structures and substrate. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 215(2), 205-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(97)00046-4 
DOI
10.1016/S0022-0981(97)00046-4
主題
ecological associations; feeding behaviour; mangrove swamps; marine crustaceans; marine fish; predation; protective behaviour; sheltered habitats; substrate preferences; refuges; shelters; Lates calcarifer; Lutjanus argentimaculatus; Metapenaeus ensis; Penaeus monodon; South East Asia
Taxonomic term
Penaeus monodon; Sonneratia griffithii; Lates calcarifer
Collections
  • AQD Journal Articles [1249]

© SEAFDEC 2025
連絡先
 

 

ブラウズ

リポジトリ全体コミュニティ/コレクション公開日著者タイトル主題このコレクション公開日著者タイトル主題

登録利用者

ログイン
Related Links
SEAFDEC/TD IRSEAFDEC/AQD IRSEAFDEC/MFRDMD IRSEAFDEC/IFRDMD IR

© SEAFDEC 2025
連絡先