Show simple item record

Share 
 
dc.contributor.authorRomana-Eguia, Maria Rowena R.
dc.contributor.authorIkeda, Minoru
dc.contributor.authorBasiao, Zubaida U.
dc.contributor.authorTaniguchi, Nobuhiko
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-12T05:29:33Z
dc.date.available2014-05-12T05:29:33Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.citationRomana-Eguia, M. R. R., Ikeda, M., Basiao, Z. U., & Taniguchi, N. (2004). Genetic diversity in farmed Asian Nile and red hybrid tilapia stocks evaluated from microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA analysis. Aquaculture, 236(1-4), 131-150.en
dc.identifier.issn0044-8486
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10862/2025
dc.description.abstractWe analyzed microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA restriction fragment length polymorphism (mtDNA-RFLP) in two domesticated (NIFI and Israel) and four genetically improved (GIFT, GMT, FAC-selected and SEAFDEC-selected) Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) as well as five red hybrid tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus × O. niloticus) stocks (BFS, FACred, NIFIred, HL, and PF) farmed in Asia. Microsatellite variation at five loci (UNH216, UNH172, UNH123, UNH147, UNH222) was more informative in characterizing stock differences than the mtDNA-RFLP markers that were based only on 14 restriction morphs. Contemporary microsatellite data showed that GIFT Nile tilapia had the highest mean expected heterozygosity (H>e=0.813), while GMT had the lowest (He=0.666). The unselected NIFI stock and SEAFDEC-selected were genetically similar, while GMT differed significantly from the other Nile tilapia stocks. Among the red tilapias, NIFIred had the highest He (0.715), while BFS had the lowest variability (He=0.567). The Taiwanese red tilapia HL and Thai NIFIred were genetically similar. Except for NIFI, most of the Nile and red tilapia stocks exhibited remarkably significant homozygote excess relative to Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE), suggesting some degree of inbreeding. Asian Nile tilapias were more genetically diverse (pooled He=0.791; mtDNA nucleotide divergence value dA=0.009) than the red tilapias (pooled He=0.697; mean dA=0.004). This slight divergence between the Nile and red tilapias was also seen in the analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA; FCT=0.0018) and in genetic distance and nucleotide divergence dendrograms. However, the AMOVA revealed that the greater percentage of variation (99.33%) in the total genetic diversity of the surveyed stocks is principally due to differences at the individual level and not between nor within groups. The significance of these results is that they reflect and lead to new inferences regarding the selective breeding and culture methods used in managing these farmed stocks.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors would like to thank Drs. Tereso A. Abella, Remedios Bolivar and Jose Abucay of FAC-CLSU, Mr. Basilio Rodriguez Jr. and his staff at GIFT Foundation International and PhilFishGen for allowing the collection of fin-clip samples from their tilapia breeding stocks. The assistance of Ruel V. Eguia, Adelaida L. Arago, Bienvenido Banaag and Federico Reyes of SEAFDEC/AQD is likewise appreciated. M.R.R. Eguia is grateful to the Philippine Department of Science and Technology for their support and to the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for providing research funds for this study.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.subjectOreochromis niloticusen
dc.subjectAsiaen
dc.subjectIsraelen
dc.subjectGenetically improved stocksen
dc.subjectMitochondrial DNA-RFLPen
dc.subjecttilapiaen
dc.titleGenetic diversity in farmed Asian Nile and red hybrid tilapia stocks evaluated from microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA analysisen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.citation.volume236
dc.citation.issue1-4
dc.citation.spage131
dc.citation.epage150
dc.citation.journalTitleAquacultureen
dc.subject.asfaDNAen
dc.subject.asfafish cultureen
dc.subject.asfagenetic variationen
dc.subject.asfahybrid cultureen
dc.subject.asfamicrosatellitesen
dc.subject.asfainbreedingen
dc.subject.asfanucleotidesen
dc.subject.asfaselective breedingen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aquaculture.2004.01.026


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • AQD Journal Articles [1215]
    These papers were contributed by AQD staff to various national and international journals

Show simple item record